<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Polemical Theology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://polemicaltheology.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://polemicaltheology.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>For God alone is the Lord of the conscience.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 04:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Presbyterians need not apply. by Ex Ligonier Donor</title>
		<link>http://polemicaltheology.wordpress.com/2007/05/12/presbyterians-need-not-apply/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Ex Ligonier Donor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 18:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://polemicaltheology.wordpress.com/2007/05/12/presbyterians-need-not-apply/#comment-14</guid>
		<description>"Presbyterians need not apply"? What about "Defrocked ministers welcome"? One of the speakers at the Ligonier conference (again) was the defrocked R.C. Sproul Jr. 

I've been troubled about the condition of Ligonier Ministries for a couple years now. In the past year in particular Ligonier has completely lost my support. Here's just one example of the depth of corruption that has overtaken this organization. 

http://ministrywatchman.com/?p=98</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Presbyterians need not apply&#8221;? What about &#8220;Defrocked ministers welcome&#8221;? One of the speakers at the Ligonier conference (again) was the defrocked R.C. Sproul Jr. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been troubled about the condition of Ligonier Ministries for a couple years now. In the past year in particular Ligonier has completely lost my support. Here&#8217;s just one example of the depth of corruption that has overtaken this organization. </p>
<p><a href="http://ministrywatchman.com/?p=98" rel="nofollow">http://ministrywatchman.com/?p=98</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on PT Thesis I by David A Booth</title>
		<link>http://polemicaltheology.wordpress.com/2007/05/10/pt-thesis-i/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>David A Booth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 15:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://polemicaltheology.wordpress.com/2007/05/10/pt-thesis-i/#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Bingo!

Yet, please note:

1. To earn a Ph.D. in Theology/Biblical Studies today - a person is required to do "original research".
2. Original research in the Academy is virtually a celebration of "theological imagination".
3. We hire these Ph.D.'s to teach our future pastors in seminary.
4. Then we wonder 50 years later why the church keeps embracing heterodoxy!

David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bingo!</p>
<p>Yet, please note:</p>
<p>1. To earn a Ph.D. in Theology/Biblical Studies today - a person is required to do &#8220;original research&#8221;.<br />
2. Original research in the Academy is virtually a celebration of &#8220;theological imagination&#8221;.<br />
3. We hire these Ph.D.&#8217;s to teach our future pastors in seminary.<br />
4. Then we wonder 50 years later why the church keeps embracing heterodoxy!</p>
<p>David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
